From:
To:
Rework process-model based on review feedback
@DB feels that the phrasing “in the factory” and “actual state” misrepresent the features of the library. Namely hiding the fact that the library provides the ability to:
- represent processes programmatically
- store and recall the current state
- store and recall the history of the process
How about this: the process-model provides a framework for recording the operation of processes, enabling the storage and recall of both their real-time and historical state.
@DB did not understand the impetus of my description of the functioning of NamedInputUnloads “under-the-hood”.
I have removed it as it risks causing confusion where simply reading the implementation is best.