A Real Example continued

• A Real Example

Key

As an addendum to the prior, I am going to define the Universe $\Omega$ as

$$\Omega =\left\{\Phi ,F,t\right\}$$

Where:

• $\Phi$: Objective Space
• $F$: Function Space
• $t$: time
• $\Theta$: Configuration Space

so back to our smoothie example…

$$F=\left\{F^0,F^1,\dots ,F^5\right\}$$

where $F^0,\dots ,F^5$ are the Conveyance Functions for their respective Processes

---

Another Aside:

${\Phi }_i,{\Phi }_o,{\Phi }_c$? As in replace $\Theta$ with ${\Phi }_c$. What I am saying is that the problem with separating the “Configuration Space” out at the universe level is shooting ourselves in the foot, as it does not allow that which is… (I trail off here) By binding it to the Object Space instead, we effectively make it just another input.

$$\therefore {\Phi }_o=F({\Phi }_i)$$

the Output Space is purely a function of the Input Space.

This is rather more abstract, and I am not too sure it is correct, but I think it might have to be.

This matter of “Abstract” or “immaterial” objects has made me uncomfortable the whole time.

I am leaving it here for now…